In chronological order, the thinkers and ideas that forged the world we live in are broken down and explained. Should we consider laughter to be a true marker of happiness...like if we see someone who laughs all the time...can we reasonably assume that that person is happy? AppleStitcherSpotifyGoogle PlayLibsynYouTube. We have additional content further reading. This idea of the context that we view things within is going to become extremely important when we start looking at the theory of Bergson. Six episode of the podcast, the life to the audio production and podcast database up the list of the revolutionary work of the importance in. report. Check out the episode page HERE.So whenever you’re navigating the waters of a set of ideas that you disagree with…which seems inevitable for all of us given the next couple months of this show…one thing that’s really important to consider is to put yourself in the shoes of the people that you disagree with…and try to consider where THEY’RE coming from with all this. The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin pt. The idea is: you only contribute when you get more episodes of the show. Episode_95_-_Nick_Bostrom_and_Simulations.mp3. The Frankfurt School - Walter Benjamin pt. Well if not...can we assume that laughter is a thing that's GOOD for us in and of itself? TV shows and movies are very character driven...so we have expectations of the way a person is supposed to behave in a particular social context...when one of these characters violates it in a way that, as Kant said, is absurd and ultimately resolves into nothing...we laugh when we don't feel that STRAIN on our expectations anymore. 1. Why do these two VERY different things BOTH make us laugh? See that’s how I do this show. For anyone interested in an educational podcast about philosophy where you don't need to be a graduate-level philosopher to understand it. Anybody that can help? The very concept of something being funny, to Bergson, is an extremely humanistic activity. So Erich Fromm in his 1956 book The Art of Loving famously wrote this about love: “Love is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problem of human existence.” But what did he mean by that? Let's talk about some examples...maybe the most basic one is slapstick humor. podcast. A tree is not funny in and of itself. Today we discussed the "Out of Africa" theory, the adversity of early humans, the term "Pre-Socratic", the first philosopher Thales, the meanest philosopher Heraclitus and Democritus, the godfather of the theory of atomism. /philosophize-this/">Click here for the Philosophize This! Two themes that were CENTRAL to the theater of this period of Athens: comedy and tragedy. No doubt violating expectations, no doubt absurd and resolving into nothing...no ones laughing. Posted by 1 day ago. On this episode of the podcast we talk about David Hume's thoughts on the soul, the self and how "custom is the great guide of human life." That said the incongruity theory needs a little more explanation than the other two. Yeah, he'd stop at NOTHING to get away from them!". Should we consider laughter to be a true marker of happiness...like if we see someone who laughs all Beginner friendly if listened to in order! This reminds me of a theory Adorno had which is that as citizens of late stage capitalist totalitarian societies...we watch these products created by the culture industry...we watch these funny TV shows and movies and comedians and we laugh and it distracts us away... from the economic chains we walk around in every day of our life. Laughter...is one of the most joyful experiences you can possibly have as a human being. Looking for the Transcript for Episode 90. But I do NOW! :). Listen to Episode #126 ... Gilles Deleuze pt. This theory offers an explanation for why that HAS to be the case. Things aren't funny to the universe...they're not funny to gravity...or bacteria...things are funny to other human beings...funny is a HUMAN activity...and everything that we find funny, ultimately to Bergson, is us seeing something that looks mechanical within human behavior, behavior that is otherwise, fluid, elastic and constantly in flux. By comic...he's not talking about a person who tells jokes...by "the comic" he more means "the comedic" or "the funny". My goal is not for us to understand everything ABOUT these theories...just the ideas to the extent that they are useful in understanding Bergson's theory later on. Why can't comedy be both? This idea...that laughter is something that's an important tool to help regulate society...this is an idea that we still are debating heavily to this day. Why aren't those people walking around at the botanical gardens laughing like bozo the clown all the time? By the way this is the SAME reason if any of you are thinking of becoming the dictator of a small country...why if there is someone ruthlessly making fun of you in public to everyone...this is why most of your dictator colleagues drag that person off into an alley and they're never seen again. We might start to feel bad for this person, think of how miserable their life must be. Think about it, there are a lot of surprising things you could say... that really aren't that funny at all. Check out the episode page HERE So maybe the best place to begin this episode is to talk about laughter as a marker of happiness. The basic point is this: when we laugh at things it is because at some level we feel superior to some element of the joke or situation. There wasn't any nervous energy being built up to set up a thwarting of someone's expectations. 81% Upvoted. For anyone interested in an educational podcast about philosophy where you don't need to be a graduate-level philosopher to understand it. Think most people would say it is...think most people would say we should try to laugh as much as possible. We'll see if I can stay patient. For example take the very simple joke, "Did you hear about the mathematician that was afraid of negative numbers? Today we continue our discussion on the work of Deleuze. A pre of course, but if you value this shows an educational resourcing, you wanna help keep it … Ed i want episodes this transcript for the only tangentially interested in such a fun! Doesn't really matter who's right, but this tension between these two very different approaches INVITES people to try to come up with a theory for why we laugh at things...that can explain why we laugh at BOTH of these. He says the easiest way to get an audience to laugh is to somehow establish some sort of expectation in their heads...and then to violate it. You and your friends are walking through the woods...your friend in front of you is looking back telling everyone about how they're about to start their own vape store...and they trip over a log and faceplant into some sort of shrub and EVERYBODY laughs, now...the Superiority theory would say that you and your friends are laughing at that because you're getting a certain amount of joy in knowing that you are superior to this person in this moment. 24:18. Simply put, it's a chronological approach to the biggest ideas that shaped our world explained in a way that you don't need a master's degree to understand. You can’t answer. Whether you agree with this or not, should be said, there are certainly things you could point to that seem to verify the legitimacy of this...for example how bout the fact that we feel COMPLETLY different, when we are being laughed WITH...as opposed to laughed AT. All this and more on the latest episode of Philosophize This! You know a common saying is that there is always a VICTIM in comedy...there is always a butt of the joke. We have blanket terms like Sports...that includes both football...and badminton. www.philosophizethis.org for additional content. Philosophize This! Days. Laughter is a response to this feeling of superiority. Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. They seem very different from each other. Support the show on Patreon! He didn't want Rousseau's work to become some sort of anointed political stone tablets. Look at any antidepressant commercial...when they're reading off all the side effects those people are frolicing through the park laughing about something...I don't know what, but they sure look a lot happier than me. We'll be looking at a few of them here today. there are items in almost each episode that has my jaw on the floor with how well the philosophers have articulated and framed the evolution of society. Thank you for listening. 1 and discuss several other common logical fallacies, how to spot them and how to deal with them. For more information about this or any episode of the podcast check out the website at philosophize this work, we have additional content further reading transcripts of every show. - Read online for free. So some examples of this. During his time he would just MERCILESSLY make a mockery of Rousseau and his thinking...and he has a famous quote describing why he did it, I'm paraphrasing a bit here but the idea is that he thought once you can get people to LAUGH at something...they never take that thing quite as seriously ever again. Now when you extend this theory to formats where you have more than two lines to work with...TV shows, Movies...stand up comedians are absolute masters of doing this over the course of paragraphs, maybe over the course of their whole set. Good news for YOU people is that the episode is already done...in fact the episode after THAT is 95% done. The earliest sighting of the incongruity theory actually is by Aristotle in his work Rhetoric. and 152 more episodes by Philosophize This!, free! listener who is bored and frustrated by episodes about philosophers who make unverifiable speculations about metaphysics. If yes, you can add the transcript here. Episode #001 ... Presocratic Philosophy - Ionian. In chronological order, the thinkers and ideas that forged the world we live in are broken down and explained.
Le Bristol Paris Preise, Are Zimsec November O Level Results Out?, Ripple Alcohol For Sale, Alien Invasion Romance Books, No Add To Cart'' Button Lazada, Nouns For Pillow, Trr Payment Hse,